Social Media During Litigation: What You Need To Know
Jonathan Cattey
Nov 12 2026 14:00
When you are involved in a lawsuit, it may seem as though your case and your social media accounts belong in two entirely different parts of your life. You might continue using Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, or other platforms as usual, without realizing that a photo, comment, check-in, or reaction could become relevant to the dispute.
In reality, online activity can play a role in litigation. After a case is filed—and sometimes beforehand—the other side may review public posts and seek additional social media material connected to the issues in the case.
This does not mean you must be afraid to use social media. It does mean that it is wise to be deliberate about what you share while a case is pending. Understanding social media evidence and discovery can help prevent an otherwise routine post from creating unnecessary complications.
Online Activity May Be Used as Evidence
During litigation, it is important to recognize that content shared online can potentially become evidence. If a post relates to an issue in the dispute, it may be reviewed and raised in connection with the case.
Social media evidence includes more than written posts. Photos, videos, comments, location check-ins, status updates, and reactions to someone else’s content may all be relevant. Depending on the circumstances, opposing counsel may look for material related to claimed injuries, emotional distress, or differing accounts of what occurred.
A post that seems unrelated to your civil lawsuit may still be interpreted differently by someone reviewing it for litigation purposes. For example, an image shared casually may be used to suggest something inconsistent with a position taken in the case.
That is why it helps to look beyond your original purpose for posting. An ordinary interaction online may take on a different meaning once it is examined as possible evidence.
Social Media Discovery Is Not Unlimited
Having a lawsuit underway does not automatically give the opposing party unrestricted access to every item you have ever shared online. Courts generally expect social media discovery requests to be targeted and tied to information that is relevant to the dispute.
Put differently, litigation does not make your full social media history available for unrestricted review. Requests should ordinarily be narrow rather than broad demands for every message, image, comment, or post associated with an account.
Still, social media content that is relevant to the issues may be discoverable. When someone places a physical condition or emotional well-being at issue, for instance, online content that directly relates to that subject may be requested during discovery.
This distinction matters. Your accounts are not automatically open books simply because a lawsuit exists, but social media should not be viewed as completely separate from the discovery process either.
Deleting Posts May Lead to Additional Concerns
Once someone realizes that social media could affect a case, the instinct may be to review old posts and delete anything that seems unfavorable. During active litigation, however, deleting content can create more difficulty rather than resolve it.
Removing a post does not necessarily erase it. Digital content can leave a lasting record, and material may remain available even after it has been taken down from an account.
More significantly, deleting or altering material after litigation begins can raise separate legal issues. In certain situations, the removal of content that should have been preserved may result in sanctions.
Instead of deciding independently that a post should be removed, discuss concerns about existing social media activity with your attorney. Your legal team can explain how preservation obligations, including a litigation hold, may apply in the circumstances of your case.
Use Caution Before Posting While a Case Is Pending
For many people, the most cautious approach during an active case is to pause new social media activity until they have spoken with their legal team. Each matter is different, so there is no one rule that applies to every person or every lawsuit.
Caution is valuable because it can be difficult to predict how another person may portray a post. Something that seems harmless—or unrelated to the case—when it is shared may later be considered from an entirely different perspective.
The same consideration applies to engaging with other people’s online content. Comments, reactions, tags, check-ins, and similar interactions all contribute to your digital presence. Being thoughtful about those actions may reduce the chance of creating new material that later becomes disputed.
Limiting or pausing your social media use does not mean assuming that every online action will damage your case. It is simply a practical step that may help avoid avoidable questions while litigation is ongoing.
Managing Your Digital Presence During Litigation
Because social media is part of daily life, it is understandable that people do not always connect their online habits with a legal matter. Once litigation begins, though, it is worth approaching digital activity with added care.
It may help to keep several key points in mind: online activity can become evidence, relevant content may be requested through discovery, and deleting material is not a dependable solution. Most importantly, decisions about posting, preserving, or changing content should be made with the particular facts of your case in mind.
The purpose is not to make you anxious about every photograph, comment, or interaction you have shared online. It is to reduce the possibility that unintended content will complicate a separate legal issue.
For people facing civil litigation in Milwaukee and throughout southeastern Wisconsin, Levine Law LLC provides experienced representation in complex legal matters. If you have questions about social media use during an active case, social media discovery, or the effect of your online presence on a lawsuit, our Milwaukee civil litigation attorneys can discuss your situation and help you understand what steps may be appropriate while your case proceeds.


